Call Us

ARTICLES

Arthrosamid®’s story started two decades ago. The brainchild of the team at Contura, the product had been in human use for various indications since 2000, and a favourable safety profile had already been established.

Comparing SINOGEL and Steroid Therapies in Chondroitin Treatment: How Long Does Relief Last and Is It Safe?

Introduction

Managing joint pain and osteoarthritis can have a major impact on your daily life and well-being. Two popular treatments that are often used alongside chondroitin—a natural compound that supports healthy cartilage—are SINOGEL and steroid injections. But which works best, and which is safer? In this article, we’ll explore two key questions: How long does the relief from these treatments actually last? And what are the safety considerations for each option? By breaking down these factors, we hope to help you and your healthcare provider make informed, personalized choices about joint care. We’ll begin by explaining how SINOGEL works, then compare the duration and safety of each treatment, and finally offer some practical guidance for deciding what’s right for you.

What Is SINOGEL and How Does It Work?

SINOGEL is a treatment created to enhance joint health by restoring the cushion and lubrication within the joint. It contains hyaluronic acid—a substance naturally found in healthy joint fluid—blended with chondroitin to further support cartilage. Together, these ingredients help replenish the joint environment, resulting in smoother, more comfortable movement.

Unlike steroid injections, which quickly reduce inflammation by dampening the immune response, SINOGEL works differently. Instead of just masking symptoms, it helps nurture and restore the joint’s natural function over time. For patients concerned about the potential side effects of steroids, SINOGEL offers a gentle, more natural alternative.

How Long Does Relief Last? Weeks or Months?

One of the main differences between SINOGEL and steroids is how long their benefits typically last. Steroid injections can bring fast and effective pain relief, but this effect usually lasts only a few weeks to a couple of months. The relief can wear off quickly, often leading to the need for repeat injections—with a risk of increasing damage to the joint if used too frequently.

SINOGEL typically works more gradually, but the relief often lasts longer—sometimes for several months. This longer-lasting effect is possible because SINOGEL supports the health and quality of joint fluid and cartilage, rather than simply reducing inflammation. For many patients, this means fewer treatments and a more consistent improvement in joint comfort and function.

Safety and Side Effects: What You Need to Know

Safety is a crucial consideration in any joint treatment. Steroid injections, although effective, can bring certain risks. Possible side effects include temporary joint infections, weakening of the cartilage and joint structures if used often, and even systemic effects like raised blood sugar levels. For those with other health concerns or conditions, these risks need careful management, and steroids may not always be the best option for ongoing care.

In contrast, SINOGEL generally has an excellent safety profile. Its side effects are typically mild and limited to the injection site, such as temporary discomfort or swelling. Because SINOGEL does not contain steroids, it avoids many of the more significant risks associated with frequent steroid use, making it a safer choice for long-term joint health. Of course, with any treatment, it’s important to work with a healthcare professional to make sure it’s appropriate for your specific situation.

Conclusion: Which Treatment Is Right for You?

Both SINOGEL and steroid injections have their strengths and limitations when used alongside chondroitin for joint pain relief . While steroid injections offer quicker pain relief, the effects tend to be shorter-lived and can accumulate safety concerns with repeated use. SINOGEL, meanwhile, provides relief that often lasts for months and comes with fewer side effects, making it a compelling choice for those looking for sustainable joint support.

Ultimately, the ideal treatment comes down to your individual needs—such as your symptoms, overall health, and lifestyle preferences. By weighing how long the relief will last and considering the safety of each option, you and your healthcare provider can confidently choose the therapy that helps you move more comfortably and live better every day.

References

Muthu, S., Viswanathan, V. K., & Gangadaran, P. (2025). Is platelet-rich plasma better than steroids as epidural drug of choice in lumbar disc disease with radiculopathy? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Experimental Biology and Medicine, 250. https://doi.org/10.3389/ebm.2025.10390

Sobolev, V. P., & Bidanova, D. B. (2021). The role of intranasal steroid therapy in the treatment of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps. Meditsinskiy Sovet = Medical Council, (6), 74-80. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701x-2021-6-74-80

Decoding the Link: How Accurate Hyperlipidaemia ICD-10 Coding Can Improve Knee Osteoarthritis Care

Explore the vital connection between hyperlipidaemia and knee osteoarthritis, and how accurate ICD-10 coding enhances diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes. This article delves into the significance of ICD-10 codes like E78.5 (hyperlipidaemia) and M17 (knee osteoarthritis), emphasizing the need for precise documentation to enable holistic care, improved data sharing, and effective management of comorbidities. Learn how comprehensive ICD-10 coding, supported by emerging research, helps clinicians recognize metabolic risks impacting joint health, paving the way for integrated, patient-centered strategies. Discover the latest insights for healthcare professionals seeking better outcomes through optimized coding and coordinated care.

Read More »

Rethinking Disability in Knee Osteoarthritis: Where Medical Diagnosis Meets Social Reality

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common condition causing pain, stiffness, and limited mobility, often affecting middle-aged and older adults. This article explores whether knee OA should be considered a disability, emphasizing that its impact extends beyond physical joint damage to include emotional and social challenges. While clinical treatments focus on managing pain and improving function, psychological factors like depression and anxiety significantly influence the degree of disability experienced. A holistic approach that combines physical rehabilitation with psychological support is crucial for improving quality of life in OA patients. By redefining knee osteoarthritis through the biopsychosocial model, the article advocates for more comprehensive care and greater societal understanding, empowering those living with OA to lead fuller lives.

Read More »